Brian answers me: > > Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > > I agree with Leslie here. > > We all agree it's a distinct topic. I would tend to argue for it > being in techspec scope, because I don't see where else it can > be discussed, but I suspect Leslie disagrees. >
I think that in TechSpec we want to document our requirements for an IETF publication process. Currently that is documents send from IESG, IAB and IRTF to the RFC-Editor. I would think that it is good to define those 3 types of documents as being the ones we have been considering. If in the future there are other categories, then I guess they would ny default have the same requirements. If not, then we may need to update the TechSpec document at that time. The other place to discuss individual-submissions-directly-to-rfced could be NewTrk or maybe general ietf mailing list. Or someone could setup a separate list for that. Just my (personal) thinking. Bert > Brian _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
