Christof Biebricher wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Daniel Taupin wrote: > > > Appended if my proposal for a further version of musixtex.tex. > > Before posting it officially, I would like to as to all of you to test > > it, in place of the T109 ot T110 versions you may have. Some command > > structures have been changes and it does not fail in some of my > > examples, but other tests would be welcome. > > Checked with several older and newer files under linux; works fine. > > Is there somebody who observes difficulties or slowing down when \including > musixadd? Otherwise it could IMO also be incorporated in musixtex.
I'm really reluctant, once more, because of the problem of register consumption. This make musixadd and musixmadd not compatible with other register consuming packages, especially in LaTeX. Otherwise, MusiXTeX would become reserved for Omega users. > > Christof > > _______________________________________________ > TeX-music mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Daniel Taupin, 91400 ORSAY - France E-mail= mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Home/fax: (33)1.60.10.26.44. Rep.: (33)1.60.10.04.13, fax (work) (33)1.69.15.60.86 _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://sunsite.dk/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
