Thanks for looking at it. I have the feeling, if the two minimum segments of the bracket could let a little bit shorter, many of the obscured '3' could be solved.
Andre ----- Original Message ----- From: "Col. G. L. Sicherman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Typesetting music with TeX" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [TeX-music] pmx - AT brackets > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 03:15:51PM +0200, Cornelius C. Noack wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Andre Van Ryckeghem wrote: > > > > > I mean the 2 parts of the bracket should be more apart. > > > Now the '3' shows as it is cross out. > > > > Andre, now I understand your question, and it seems to me that > > you have discovered a bug (which I should have noticed already > > when I put the example Fig. B13 in my tutorial!). In fact, when > > you split this example in 2 lines (take the 2nd option for > > "nsystems" in the attached PMX source), giving the brackets more > > room to spread, everything is the way it was intended by Col. > > Sicherman. > > > > I can't tell you offhand whether this behaviour is due to the > > original Sicherman macro "tuplet.tex" , or to the way that is > > included by PMX via the AT option. Either Sicherman or Don Simons > > should be quicker than me in finding the reason. > > I have not looked at it yet. I mentioned in my headnotes for > tuplet.tex that a minimum separation is needed. If the notes are > packed too close, the "3" is obscured. > > Fot now you may be able to avoid this problem by using the older > triplet macro. I'll try out your code later and see what's wrong. > > --Col. S. > > -- > Col. G. L. Sicherman > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > TeX-music mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music > _______________________________________________ TeX-music mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://icking-music-archive.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
