On Oct 14, 9:38 am, "S. Sriram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My question is what ideas do readers of this list have for something > like this and how might they want to use such a facility.
I have been using FireBaggr for a few days and I can see a lot of potential. It needs some tweaking and tailoring for file manipulation and to optimize it for specific reasons yet to be solidified. At the moment I see it used as a project based program where lots of different documents can be grouped for easy access worked on and exported/saved as a group if need be. Or with the use of the templates generating similar 'Jaspers' to disseminate to many users and then pulling them back together for consolidation. For instance for research groups or student handouts and lessons However collaboration and true multiuser is a bit more difficult. I can see a project leader aggregating inputs from several separate sources into FireBaggr but at the moment simultaneous changes or a passing around through a group could be could get logistically interesting:-) A read/modify/pass on regimen would have to be set up properly and rigidly enforceable and in the end these things never completely overcome human recalcitrance. At this stage of my experimenting I still see it as a single user tool for complicated projects. It also might be a good tool for assembling manuals or even a novel. And here's food for thought: Since the original designer of TiddlySnip has been forced to abandon its development and with your expertise with Firefox plugins it would fit well in coordination with FireBaggr. TiddlySnip could be used to assemble the components of more complex documents and along with multiple file manipulation could be a bridge to span and coordinate content between a range of documents both within and without of FireBaggr. Besides that you would become a hero to TiddlySnip users. By the way could you tell me how to access templates in FireBaggr and be able to add my own? Morris On Oct 14, 9:38 am, "S. Sriram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wolfgang wrote: > > Hi Sriram, > > > I don't understand you. Do you mean a locally installed Firefox > > extension as FireBaggr would make it possible to have multiuser > > collaboration with TiddlyWikies stored on servers, like the one at > > TiddlySpot? > > Yes, one example would be that any file within FireBaggr could be > "shared" by Person A. > Persons B & C now would 'import this shared file' into their FireBaggr > make changes etc. > to their copy of this file and 'submit the changes', Persons A, B, C & D > now would see > the new (updated version) within their FireBaggr. Some conflict/diff > management could > be instituted to allow for rolling back the changes. > > - Enterprises could use it to have their employees collaborate on > various documents etc. > - TW users could use it to collaboratively build a 'help/faq' file etc. > > My question is what ideas do readers of this list have for something > like this and > how might they want to use such a facility. > > S. Sriram --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWiki@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
