Mark S. wrote: > > I think if people want a detailed split, then they should use the slicer > edition. The SE uses the sax.js library to break down things atomically. > However, even it doesn't always get it right -- you see remainders of HTML > tags in the sample split. The problem with the slicer edition is that the > result isn't really portable -- it needs to be viewed inside the slicer > edition, AFAIK. >
Fully agree. The Slicer is excellent if you don't want to look into the mechanics of HOW it does it. I'm working from POV that I "already cleaned my input". I tried slicer but its not for me. Mainly because I already know how to prep a page for input. Horses for courses? TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/57496ded-ff46-40dd-b726-bf5d84a6a605%40googlegroups.com.
