David,

I think I understand what you are suggesting and think what ever can help 
to capture and re-envision the content is an ideal place for tiddlywiki to 
operate it. I have read it multiple times.

For clarification, in my words.

   - is a key part of this idea that new tiddlers can be created from the 
   intersection of two or more "attributes of a tiddler", in this case one or 
   more tags/tags fields and or object-type in this case a definition?
   - Then in the new tiddler you can view information as it relates to this 
   intersection?

If I am correct here, may I suggest;

   - It may not be necessary to create said tiddler, more just a view that 
   looks like a separate tiddler, until such time as you wish to store 
   something unique for that "intersection" or relationship.

I tend to be a little more abstract in my thinking and try to design for 
maximum flexibility, so I am inspired by your idea but have not quite 
digested the full picture yet. Once I do I may be able to make a 
mechanism or set of mechanism's that let you achieve what you want, but the 
will offer a broader set of possibilities.

In many ways what you are asking seems to be a way of viewing the results 
of organising tiddlers with two or more attributes?

Regards
Tones





On Monday, 5 October 2020 07:22:47 UTC+11, David Gifford wrote:
>
> Hi positiv... no worries, if you don't have internal motivation by reading 
> the steps I already put, maybe someone else will. I think my description 
> was clear enough. But here is a second try.
>
> 1. Content creators
> a. Create tiddler
> b. tag with topic "Botany" and with format "Definitions" (and perhaps 
> there are two tag fields in edit mode, one for topics, one for formats. I 
> mentioned that Gen tags already does this.
> c. Add text "Botany is the science of bots - robots, nanobots, etc" and 
> save tiddler.
> d. And so the content creators can 'dump' individual notes quickly that 
> show up automatically in any revelant topics AND any relevant formats.
>
> 2. End user (I will upload file to Internet for users to consult)
> a. Filters and chooses a topic from a dropdown list, similar to the 
> List-search macro. A tiddler is created with the entries tagged with that 
> topic, with entries grouped under headers, the headers being the various 
> formats. Title, Botany, organized by format. The tiddler mentioned in (1) 
> shows up, under the "Definitions" header
> b. Similar process for choosing a format from a dropdown, and getting a 
> tiddler "Definitions (organized by topic)" with topical headers, and 
> tiddlers appear grouped under them as either links or transclusions. The 
> tiddler above appears under the heading "Botany".
> c. User also has the option to choose both topic AND format, to produce a 
> tiddler "Botany - Definitions."
> d. And so the user can read export or print notes, either filtered by two 
> criteria, or filtered by one and organized by the other.
>
> I think this could be valuable. I can foresee many usecases besides those 
> I personally am interested in. I am not actually asking anyone to do it. 
> But if someone here agrees it is valuable and has the knowhow to do it, 
> great. If not, no worries. Just sharing an idea to see if there is 
> interest. Blessings.
>
> On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 1:12:00 PM UTC-5 positiv...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Everything bad is good for someone else. The problem with creating 
>> something from someone else's idea is that there isn't any internal 
>> motivation. Collaboration is much more likely to produce results.
>>
>> You should publish a wiki with some "user stories" describing the steps a 
>> user would go through to accomplish something meaningful in their life. 
>> Then I could flesh out the programmatic steps it would take to get those 
>> user steps to work within the reality of a web browser running Javascript 
>> stored in an HTML file, and you can update the wiki with more ideas from 
>> there. This way you can iteratively see the project coming to life, and 
>> gradually learn what trade-offs are needed between theory and reality.
>>
>> On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 6:23:25 AM UTC-7 David Gifford wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Why am I cursed with so many ideas, but so little time and knowhow to 
>>> implement them? I am just going to throw this out there. If anyone thinks 
>>> it is worthwhile to create this, go for it. Not for me, just if you think 
>>> it is genuinely helpful.
>>>
>>> Part 1: a content creator adds tiddlers, and tags them by topic, and 
>>> tags them by format (advice, reflection questions, links, definitions, 
>>> etc). The Gen Tags plugin (
>>> https://ooktech.com/jed/ExampleWikis/GenericTagFields/) might be a good 
>>> tool for helping the content creator distinguish types of tags. Or maybe 
>>> there is a better tool for that.
>>>
>>> Part 2: The end user has a control panel to filter by topic, by format, 
>>> or both: 
>>>
>>> a) filtering by both and clicking a button produces a tiddler, e.g. 
>>> "Reflection questions on botany" and the text field shows the text fields 
>>> of all tiddlers tagged by the tag "Reflection questions" and the tag 
>>> "Botany".
>>>
>>> b) Filtering only by topic produces a tiddler that lists the text field 
>>> of all the tiddlers tagged by that topic, but grouped by format. ("Entries 
>>> on Botany, organized by format") Filtering only by format does the 
>>> opposite, all the tiddlers with that format, grouped by topic ("Reflection 
>>> questions, organized by topic") 
>>>
>>> There are, obviously, more uses for this than just "topic and format". 
>>> "Topic and source (book)" comes to mind, "Recipes by main ingredient and 
>>> meal type", "Restaurants by location and category", now I am hungry, Songs 
>>> by artist and some other criteria, etc.
>>>
>>> There is a tool called Xlists, which crosses categories, and hints at 
>>> what I am getting at, but I am thinking of something that makes it easier 
>>> for both creators and users to quickly view results from combining two 
>>> types of tags. 
>>>
>>> Anyway, that is my idea for the morning. I think it would be a very 
>>> valuable addition to the TiddlyWiki repertoire. If you do too, and know how 
>>> to create it, please consider it.
>>>
>>> Blessings.
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ab1e50c1-489e-42ef-9ab8-ca5c930cd653o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to