Ciao Charlie Add some comments on how this explicitly relates to the OP please.
Otherwise its just your shopping list of "to do later" which isn't useful. TT On Saturday, 31 October 2020 18:30:29 UTC+1, Charlie Veniot wrote: > > If I may stand tall on si's shoulders ... > > I'm thinking, as you dig into cognitive science, that there are a ton of > overlapping and (to me) wildly interesting topics that compliment each > other. > > For example, (I like to think of these as all under and/or linked to si's > great catch-all of cognitive science): > > - Cognitive psychology > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_psychology#:~:text=Cognitive%20psychology%20is%20the%20scientific,%2C%20creativity%2C%20and%20thinking%22.> > - Problem solving > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_solving#Cognitive_sciences> > - Cognitive load <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_load> > - Information overload > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_overload> > - Disabilities affecting intellectual abilities > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disabilities_affecting_intellectual_abilities> > - Fight-or-flight response > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight-or-flight_response> > - Instinct <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instinct> > - Experience <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experience> > - Causality <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality> > - Philosophy <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy> > - Information Mapping > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_mapping> *(well, not the > specific methodology, but rather in general approaches to > organising thoughts)* > - etc. etc. ad infinitum ad *(well, the opposite to me because of an > insatiable appetite for this kind of stuff)* nauseam > > > There are so many things that can impact how each individual's thinking > processes. Stuff that makes the human species pretty interesting. > > Fun post, bimlas ! > > On Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 11:39:38 AM UTC-3 si wrote: > >> These encouraged me to think about the process of thinking itself. Is >>> there a science of thoughts? Would that be the philosophy? >>> >> >> I think this would fall under cognitive science >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science>. I believe that we >> refer to the process of 'thinking about thinking' as metacognition >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacognition>. >> >> I'm not well informed enough to give you any real info, but I am also >> fascinated with understanding how we think. Partly because it's just >> inherently interesting, but also because, as you say, it can help us to >> build tools that interact with out mind in a way that makes us more >> effective thinkers. >> >> I aspire to learn more about this topic in the future, but for now I just >> rely on a very fractured and low-resolution understanding to help me make >> some sense of how my mind works with regards to learning and creativity. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8bc5b140-a5f6-49a2-8bd9-b174502f6005o%40googlegroups.com.
