> *If you are asking if the above approach (an individual tiddler per link with summary pages) is better or worse than a manual page with a bunch of links you update as you find them then I would say, based on consideration for the workflow involved, quality of life interaction/steps, and also the fact that many users here have stated they have massive tiddlywiki's with little performance hit, that I would stick with what you have and not be too concern with the size.*
That's exactly what I'm asking for. I think it should concern to much about the size. > *But if i consider these resources important enough to hold a place in my Digital Garden (having presumably read or at least skimmed the articles), then i typically have something more to say about them.* Exactly! I also use to annotate my bookmarks; at least I have a small note there. Just having a link there has no value for me. > *In light of your recent article on Note Taking in 2021 <http://blog.dornea.nu/2021/06/13/note-taking-in-2021/> (excellent piece, b/t/w, what really set my own wheels turning <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o>, along with a good few others), i don't guess i'm telling you anything new, Victor... But anyway: thanks again for sparking a bit more introspection into this process i too often run, but still don't think critically enough about!* Thank you very much! I'm planning to add more posts regarding my workflow. On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 3:11:11 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote: > Hey @Victor: That's a good question- simple, but profound- one that all of > us here must answer for ourselves some non-zero number of times most days. > > The answer to this for me is a followup Q: What version of my future self > (i.e. in what context) do i imagine would find this resource to be most > useful? > If the answer to that Q comes to me easily enough, then tiddler content > -description, crossref link(s), tag(s)- then the NoteMaking tends to flow > quite naturally. > > If OTOH it does not... Well then i've got yet another note w/ a set of > links that i may very likely never bother to click. Take for example your > note on 4-Day Work Week <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek>, > which links to one canonical definition from Wikipedia, and two articles on > the topic that i know nothing about beyond the title, where it was > published, and possibly when (date is URL-encoded on one link, but not on > the other). If i'm only interested in the simplest form of NoteTaking > -i.e. resource curation, the Librarian role- then maybe that serves the > need. But if i consider these resources important enough to hold a place > in my Digital Garden (having presumably read or at least skimmed the > articles), then i typically have something more to say about them. > > In light of your recent article on Note Taking in 2021 > <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek> (excellent piece, b/t/w, > what really set my own wheels turning > <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o>, along with a good > few others), i don't guess i'm telling you anything new, Victor... But > anyway: thanks again for sparking a bit more introspection into this > process i too often run, but still don't think critically enough about! > > /walt > > On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 11:22:29 AM UTC+1 Victor Dorneanu wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> since I was not able to find such a thread, I've decided to create a new >> one. I just want to read your opinions when it's better to just have links >> (inside a tiddler) and when one should create tiddlers for them (as >> bookmarks). >> >> I'll try to describe my current problem. At the moment I use this >> Bookmarks plugin >> <https://brainfck.org/#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Finmysocks%2FBookmarks> to >> organize my bookmarks. Examples: >> >> - List of bookmarks for Tiddlywiki <https://brainfck.org/#Tiddlywiki> >> - List of bookmarks for Golang <https://brainfck.org/#Golang> >> >> As I discover more sites/resources I'd add them as a bookmark and they'll >> be automatically listed on those pages. However, doing so will also >> increase the size of my Tiddlywiki instance. I use nodeJS and call >> *tiddlywiki >> tw5 --build index *to build one single html size which then get's >> uploaded to AWS S3. >> >> Now I do know it's better to have single tiddlers for each bookmark since >> you can tag them, filter them and make them available in different >> locations (one bookmark could also be listed in multiple categories: e.g. >> Tiddlywiki *and *Golang). But I was thinking adding just links to a >> single tiddler (like this tiddler >> <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek>) might be a better >> approach. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Thanks in advance for your input and time. >> >> Cheers, >> Victor >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b64d2607-9ec3-40d6-af7f-3571a9e1a986n%40googlegroups.com.
