Hi @Victor, Personally, I create a tiddler for each bookmark. When I have several similar urls to save, for example a list of online IDE, then I create only one tiddler for the list. This way it reduces clutter but still allows me to tag and filter each link.
Here's my wiki : vaforis.github.io Currently it has over 600 tiddlers and I didn't notice any lags. Each tiddler has a link and a quick description of the url. I created it a while ago, so this is not very efficient .. if I wanted to redo it, I'd use fields to set the content and use a template to display the content, it would probably shave off quite a bit of space. Le mar. 22 juin 2021 à 16:37, Victor Dorneanu <cyn...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > *If you are asking if the above approach (an individual tiddler per > link with summary pages) is better or worse than a manual page with a bunch > of links you update as you find them then I would say, based on > consideration for the workflow involved, quality of life interaction/steps, > and also the fact that many users here have stated they have massive > tiddlywiki's with little performance hit, that I would stick with what you > have and not be too concern with the size.* > > That's exactly what I'm asking for. I think it should concern to much > about the size. > > > *But if i consider these resources important enough to hold a place in > my Digital Garden (having presumably read or at least skimmed the > articles), then i typically have something more to say about them.* > > Exactly! I also use to annotate my bookmarks; at least I have a small note > there. Just having a link there has no value for me. > > > *In light of your recent article on Note Taking in 2021 > <http://blog.dornea.nu/2021/06/13/note-taking-in-2021/> (excellent piece, > b/t/w, what really set my own wheels turning > <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o>, along with a good > few others), i don't guess i'm telling you anything new, Victor... But > anyway: thanks again for sparking a bit more introspection into this > process i too often run, but still don't think critically enough about!* > > Thank you very much! I'm planning to add more posts regarding my workflow. > On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 3:11:11 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote: > >> Hey @Victor: That's a good question- simple, but profound- one that all >> of us here must answer for ourselves some non-zero number of times most >> days. >> >> The answer to this for me is a followup Q: What version of my future self >> (i.e. in what context) do i imagine would find this resource to be most >> useful? >> If the answer to that Q comes to me easily enough, then tiddler content >> -description, crossref link(s), tag(s)- then the NoteMaking tends to flow >> quite naturally. >> >> If OTOH it does not... Well then i've got yet another note w/ a set of >> links that i may very likely never bother to click. Take for example your >> note on 4-Day Work Week <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek>, >> which links to one canonical definition from Wikipedia, and two articles on >> the topic that i know nothing about beyond the title, where it was >> published, and possibly when (date is URL-encoded on one link, but not on >> the other). If i'm only interested in the simplest form of NoteTaking >> -i.e. resource curation, the Librarian role- then maybe that serves the >> need. But if i consider these resources important enough to hold a place >> in my Digital Garden (having presumably read or at least skimmed the >> articles), then i typically have something more to say about them. >> >> In light of your recent article on Note Taking in 2021 >> <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek> (excellent piece, b/t/w, >> what really set my own wheels turning >> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o>, along with a >> good few others), i don't guess i'm telling you anything new, Victor... But >> anyway: thanks again for sparking a bit more introspection into this >> process i too often run, but still don't think critically enough about! >> >> /walt >> >> On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 11:22:29 AM UTC+1 Victor Dorneanu wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> since I was not able to find such a thread, I've decided to create a new >>> one. I just want to read your opinions when it's better to just have links >>> (inside a tiddler) and when one should create tiddlers for them (as >>> bookmarks). >>> >>> I'll try to describe my current problem. At the moment I use this >>> Bookmarks plugin >>> <https://brainfck.org/#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Finmysocks%2FBookmarks> to >>> organize my bookmarks. Examples: >>> >>> - List of bookmarks for Tiddlywiki <https://brainfck.org/#Tiddlywiki> >>> - List of bookmarks for Golang <https://brainfck.org/#Golang> >>> >>> As I discover more sites/resources I'd add them as a bookmark and >>> they'll be automatically listed on those pages. However, doing so will also >>> increase the size of my Tiddlywiki instance. I use nodeJS and call >>> *tiddlywiki >>> tw5 --build index *to build one single html size which then get's >>> uploaded to AWS S3. >>> >>> Now I do know it's better to have single tiddlers for each bookmark >>> since you can tag them, filter them and make them available in different >>> locations (one bookmark could also be listed in multiple categories: e.g. >>> Tiddlywiki *and *Golang). But I was thinking adding just links to a >>> single tiddler (like this tiddler >>> <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek>) might be a better >>> approach. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Thanks in advance for your input and time. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Victor >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b64d2607-9ec3-40d6-af7f-3571a9e1a986n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b64d2607-9ec3-40d6-af7f-3571a9e1a986n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CADf1GSmfVCb36Rac9MJnVSY-U8_Qp%3D05dRc9xx61Y1V_01B%2BEA%40mail.gmail.com.
