> this is on Mark S's list, but I would like to second support for > InlineJavascript (plugin or native) w/ TW5
TW5 will definitely support InlineJavaScript via a plugin, but I'm very cautious about putting it into the core. In shared environments it could be a vector for malicious code. It'd be OK if we could adequately sandbox the execution of the javascript fragments, but I haven't found that to be possible with current browsers. I think the best balance is for the core to continue with the current approach of systemConfig-style plugins implementing macros that are then referenced by macro invocations in the text. By keeping the code and content strictly separate we can allow servers to implement protection measures, like only executing plugins from trusted sources. Cheers Jeremy > > Mike > > On Apr 1, 10:19 am, Saverio <saverio.mavig...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Oops, tagA would be stored under the isA extended field, as well: >> >> > isA = conventionalUntypedTag1 conventionalUntypedTag2 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. > > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:jer...@osmosoft.com http://www.tiddlywiki.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
