Some more thoughts... Where - unfortunately - DropBoxWiki seems to fall short - as TiddlyWiki does itself - is in being able to collaboratively edit shared content ...beyond a mere aggregation of otherwise independent content bits. In some cases, of course, this might already be more than welcome. However, as pointed out by others already DropBox gives a lot of flexibility in terms of external files, which under certain conditions might be more important than the added value of shared editing.
Perhaps it might make sense to focus on and investigate scenarios and workflows where a master maintainer could pull content from contributors and thus (re-)structure all those content bits that ask for migration, besides a members individual content bits. A simple way to indicate that a tiddler is more of an individual, personal kind might be to prefix those with a users initials. However, the remaining question seems to be "if" or simply "how" there could be "shared tiddlers" (aka "collaboratively edited content"), rather than "shared wikis" in a DropBox environment. Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
