Hi Miles > several reasons: > - no well defined community or governance mechanisms
? https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/about > - really sketchy documentation (nothing serious at the architectural level) One more of Eric's: http://www.tiddlytools.com/insideTW/ TiddlySpace: http://tiddlywikidev.tiddlyspace.com/ > - no clear idea of how it follows standards (or doesn't) - which is > really critical as browsers keep evolving http://tiddlywiki.com/#%5B%5BTiddlyWiki%20Browser%20Compatibility%5D%5D > Re. TiddlyWeb - now it's REALLY hard to decipher what's going on under the > hood. http://tiddlyspace.tiddlyspace.com http://docs.tiddlyspace.com http://tiddlyweb.peermore.com/wiki/ etc etc etc.... > All in all, it's very frustrating. TW is very capable, obviously has a > lot of time and expertise invested in it over several years - but what > could be a really powerful platform for single-page applications has > really become more of a series of hacks than something more carefully > organized. TiddlyWiki is hackable - which is why I use it... If you're a developer I suggest that you search for plugins and plugin documentation on TiddlySpace, TiddlyTools or on GitHub. If you are an software entrepeneur PLEASE hire Eric and get the fastest most efficient response you can think of..... (And we get a happy moderator...) > In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. > In<fnord> practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra I haven't found a single <fnord> in a TW CSS template yet - however in theory there should be some ?? Cheers Måns Mårtensson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
