Great post, thanks Chris. Your perspective on BT and Osmosoft is very valuable.
>> At some point, Tiddly is going to live or die by whether or not the folks >> most committed to it find a long-term model for supporting the software and >> themselves. > > I completely disagree with this, and I think it is the prevelance of > this attitude in this thread which has contributed to me becoming > angry and finding it hard to find a way into the thread that is > clear and focused. The core of Mile's observation applies to both of us, though: we're trying to secure a long term model for supporting ourselves while we work on the software. I guess your point is that if either of us failed to establish a viable model, then it shouldn't necessarily imply the death of the software. > * When Jeremy was sucked up by the BT spaceship his availability > vaporized. Perhaps that will change now with his recent news. Yes, that's what it felt like to me, too. Doing a good job in an executive role in a big company has very, very little in common with running an open source project. I'm relishing recovering my independence. Many thanks, Jeremy -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:jer...@osmosoft.com http://www.tiddlywiki.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
