LOL and wow! And thank you ;) I agree with that last observation. On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 3:51:06 PM UTC-7, Hegart Dmishiv wrote: > > OMG, that's just what I said in GitHub > <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1727#issuecomment-141584816>, > > as you were posting here in the discussion forums. Great minds think alike! > > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 10:24:19 AM UTC+12, Rustem wrote: >> >> I've had a bit of a discussion over at GitHub >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJermolene%2FTiddlyWiki5%2Fissues%2F1908&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFMTEp9VYXLtnkZmSkRvGxHZ2myYQ>, >> >> that made me think... >> >> Right now TiddlyWiki is still failrly basic as it is. But with the influx >> of new features, there will be more and more people wanting things to look >> one way or the other. >> >> I am comfortable with customizing the interface of my wiki on my own, >> plus I don't feel like arguing my point of view to death. But when it comes >> to modifying/adding the deeper internals of TiddlyWiki, I still completely >> rely on what is delivered by Jeremy. >> >> So, I thought it would be nice if there was a "bare-bones" edition of >> TiddlyWiki. It would let me enjoy all the latest improvements to the "core >> core", without having to struggle with the ever-increasing number of "bells >> and whistles" in order to keep my wiki looking just the way I like it. >> >> --R. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/11f27e66-1c24-4feb-8289-f6b5f569de71%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
