Am 19.09.2015 um 13:59 schrieb Jeremy Ruston:
Otherwise, yes, such a split could be done. If you search the
core/modules directory for the string $:/ you'll see the dependencies
between the core JS code and actual tiddler and tag names; there's not
actually that many.
But again, I'd ask for the motivation. If it's about reducing file
size, then I think there are other options that have less impact on
the complexity of the project. If it's about being able to ignore the
core UI then I'd respond that that is already possible.
Just to be clear, my stand on this is that I'll help anyone who wants
to experiment, but I don't see how I can justify working on this
(which is quite demanding) for dubious benefit when we've got major
issues like poor multi-user behaviour to work on.
I was in no way implying that you should work on this, but I was
interested in how one would go about completely changing the UI (think
applications on top of the TW core) and which and how many ties would
have to be kept intact for TW to continue to work. So you answered both
of those, thanks for taking the time =).
/Andreas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/55FD55F0.8070407%40googlemail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.