I didn't find the Github process too arduous. What was problematic was waiting many weeks before simple, innocent documentation changes showed up or even were pulled. Apparently, documentation is treated as code (maybe because it's mixed in with the code). It doesn't seem like the proposed system will fix that..
Everyone in the TW github documentation system has to go through a signing/initiation process. They are essentially known quantities. So there shouldn't be serious trust issues. It's odd that you can post to the world's largest online encyclopedia and see it up in 20 minutes, but you can't add a simple TW document page without waiting for weeks. On a technical note, with the new process won't tiddlyspot become cluttered with dozens or hundreds of "dead" TW's after a year or two? Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b8f43eb5-a6a8-40a6-b78b-038ba547878c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
