The tiddlywiki architecture is inherently single file. This is why it is so hard to get multi-user configured properly. You would have to virtually dismantle tiddlywiki and put it together differently to get anything as static as Wikipedia.
Even the server and online versions download everything in few files and the core idea again is one file. If you load a tiddlywiki, the chances are that the entire thing will slowly get loaded as you browse if it was Wikipedia. There are many options going forward, and almost all of them are very single file oriented when setup correctly. So I don't think our browser conundrum is going to be too much of a hold up. It will only change the way things work, but they can still work just as fast. My thoughts, -Arlen On Mar 22, 2017 3:21 PM, "@TiddlyTweeter" <tiddlytwee...@assays.tv> wrote: > Ciao Danielo > > Thanks for your response. > > On Wednesday, 22 March 2017 12:51:15 UTC+1, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: >> >> >> Very good questions. I think they should be added to the official FAQ. >> Would you mind to open an issue to the official NoteSelf Repo? >> > > Sure. If it is helpful. > > >> 3 - personally I'm interested in the PouchDB / CouchDB combo for E-pubs >>> but your github does not explain how to integrate the functions of PouchDB >>> in a standard TW that would enable that (not that you SHOULD--only if you >>> interested in that). >>> >> >> That is because I'm not interested on giving support to standalone usages >> of TiddlyPouch. They require some technical skills that I don't have time >> to properly explain to normal users. Any advanced user otherwise should be >> able to just go to TiddlyPouch repo and grab it to their own needs. >> > > In the context of the current thread I am very appreciative of your > answer. I think its obvious, in a way, that one person following an > interest can't easily support carrying forward of their work other than in > a very delimited way. They just don't have the time. > > But, also, from my point of view it also looks like, in some ways,* good > things in TW that might well support wide use by non-specialists, get used > by a few, and never reach a critical mass.* I'm observing this phenomena > and thinking about it. > > Its amazing the number of WAYS that TW can be got to work. But actually > forming an overview of them, one that you could communicate to others, is > not so easy. > > Just thoughts > > Best wishes > Josiah > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/tiddlywiki/cff0047d-ebf4-4072-97e4-b094190886fe%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cff0047d-ebf4-4072-97e4-b094190886fe%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAJ1vdSTOKu6KpTqaYj-CoZZ9Ap%3Du8yKyfGAaGqt19fSrwOwq8Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
