Hi Danielo, please specify what do you mean? If you suggest that google groups is a not-good-enoug tool than what do you suggest as a better one?
Hello Jeremy. Speaking of TiddlyFox, what's the best place to discuss future development now? I've voiced a concern about Addons support discontinuation [1] and also asked about support of async saving somewhere but didn't get any responses yet. Also, to adapt TiddlyChrome for TWc [2] I need some help to understand how TiddlyFox works as I've never developed a FF addon nor a Chrome extension. Finally, MicroTiddlyServer [3] may be a candidate for [4] but it's important to a) understand the basic requirements (for instance, interfaces of MTS do not look great yet) and b) understand how TW5 is saved to adapt MTS for it as well. I'd be happy if the header of the main group has a link to the TWc group, and probably the header of TWc group should be updated accordingly. Despite the fact I was mostly silent for more than one year (PhD thesis, than a new cool job in ChildrenScience.ru that absorbs much time, but actually TW is used in couple of places "in production" [5,6, in Russian unfortunately]), I've keep deleloping new tools (TW plugins, including plotting, graph drawing, crypto tools, bibliographic references and even very early prototypes of sketch/SVG editor and WYSIWYG and many "smaller" tools) and is rather eager to share new stuff with the community, but needed a place where posts about TWc are more condensed, new stuff is not lost that quickly because of posts about TW5. As for the topics that are related to both TW5 and TWc, I think a natural approach would be to post main discussions threads here and post a link to such a thread as a thread in the TWc group so that the discussion is not split; but of'course this still has a drawback that somebody has to find such a thread here and post a link. A nicer approach would be if the discussion tool has some sort of tags so that somebody can read threads tagged TW5, somebody – TWc, somebody – both and the posts can also have any combination of those; but in that case everybody *has to* tag their posts and ideally tags should be suggested automatically (like in StackOverflow). But I'm not aware if such a discussion platform exists. Best regards, Yakov. [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikidev/VqvGlnrfLjE [2] https://github.com/Arlen22/tiddly-chrome-app/issues/12 [3] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywikiclassic/Eb48yQBof5c [4] https://github.com/TiddlyWiki/php-server [5] http://do.sch-int.ru/ [6] http://childrenscience.ru/courses/ суббота, 3 июня 2017 г., 21:42:24 UTC+3 пользователь @TiddlyTweeter написал: > > Ciao Danielo > > Do you mean "Don't use Google Groups"? If so I totally agree. Its fine > for ongoing discussion. But as an archive format its the worst. You lose > your own history. Its search mechanism is crap. It upvoting non-existent. > Its tag system (even if you bothered to activate it) so crude its useless. > > Josiah > > Danielo Rodríguez wrote: >> >> If you are going to start something apart of this group ... Please don't >> use another group, use a different tool > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/75461b8f-e444-4c08-b0a3-76cbf88f4e86%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
