Mat, Whilst it would be nice to do this with TWC its options are very limited compared to TW5 (although there are still many) perhaps instead flag TWC in so far as does the "method" also support TWC as does TiddlyDesktop but redirect others to the TWC Discussion thread and information on Migration. I have just contributed to a thread on this here https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!topic/tiddlywiki/L3p321qp7EU
The truth is the future is with TW5 and although existing TWC users may benefit from this information, I think it unwise to promote TWC as an answer to someone entering the TW universe, for its reduced maintenance, reduced futures and diminishing user base. Further, I love your work here, I wanted to do something similar but are glad you have "taken this by the reigns", I plan to provide a community resource and Expect this reference work will be key. Thanks Tony On Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 2:29:17 AM UTC+10, Mat wrote: > > Guys, just quickly; I have been, and will continue to be, busy for a few > more days so difficult to work on this at the moment. > > But, regarding TWC on SetUp - sure, why not, if I can get some help if it > is much work with it. What I mean is; > > If it is merely a matter of adding TWC as one of the criteria (i.e the top > row) then it'd be easy-peasy. That would mean you click a name like > "TWC-compatible" and see which SetUps that fulfill this... and from those > identified SetUp-rows see what other criteria the respective SetUp features. > > The more ambitious solution would be to introduce TWC as a qualifying > filter before the "Saver, Server, Service, Manager" and logically at that > level, i.e so that every listed SetUp will have to fulfill TWC and whatever > of "Saver, Server etc" that is ticked. This is not difficult to do but a > little iffy. However, what I would need help with then is to have others > bring in potential SetUps that are TWC specific and, again, the data for > them. > > Another thought: > I think the site would bring more value if it could add more info about > individual setups. Obviously, not everything fits in the matrix and even if > I've added some comments in the respective SetUp-tiddlers, there is often > good stuff found in discussions on the boards. So, it would be useful to > somehow collect data such that can be added. I'm considering accepting > links to relevant discussions - or if someone other than me curates/refines > info, then this could be added to the individual setups. (Oh, a project > like this would be sooo spot-on for TWederation!!!) > > > Again, please note I can't engage much in this for a few days. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b78e5cd1-2141-4422-8626-84c103b3d5bf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
