Mat I seen that issue you raised on GitHub. Its good what its covers.
IMO the cascade in TW can get quite complex to figure out if you hit a problem. Part of that is slack practice--i.e. overdoing add-on styling via too many tiddlers rather than adding to a "mother" sheet where you can better control it. Part of that issue TW invites as its very liberal. IMO some kind of overview could be helpful. On "Vanilla" and its cousins workings in particular. I really like Thomas Elmiger's BRICKS plugin as it gets to CSS ground zero in a way that I find illuminating. Best wishes Josiah > @TiddlyTweeter wrote... >> >> >> > So, my question, is: do the new methods improve the situation with >> cascades? >> > > Mat replied ... > I'd say the new definition "format" (i.e [data-...] ) doesn't change the > *specificity* from tc-tagged so the priority is not changed. But, as you > know, cascading means that the last run style definition "wins". Which one > is last is not up to the individual definition but instead the order in > which they are defined in the stylesheed AND the order in which the > stylesheets are processed. That latter aspect is problematic which is why I > raised this issue <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/2823>. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f33e7800-4dc4-4c09-8137-d0ec249fcf41%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
