the plugin works well for small groups where members trust each other (no one would intentionally hog the wiki). With large numbers of anonymous users, a different solution would be required.
Right, I hadn't considered that. A live demo would probably be of limited use then.
we wanted something simple without a database backend which makes it less portable. [...] I'm most excited about TiddlyWeb and would like to start experimenting with it as soon as it becomes a stable and viable option (is that the case now?)
I very much believe that TiddlyWeb is a viable option here; it's been in use by various people for a while, and the core platform reached v1.0 in January.
By default, TiddlyWeb uses a flat-file store, so no database is required, the data is stored in simple text files. In terms of complexity, it's essentially just TiddlyWiki firing off HTTP requests for individual tiddlers.
There's a sandbox instance you can play with: http://collab.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/recipes/sandbox/tiddlers.wiki -- F. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
