On Apr 7, 2:12 am, FND <f...@gmx.net> wrote: > > the plugin works well for small groups where members trust each other > > (no one would intentionally hog the wiki). With large numbers of > > anonymous users, a different solution would be required. > > Right, I hadn't considered that. A live demo would probably be of > limited use then. > > > we wanted something simple without a database backend which makes it > > less portable. [...] I'm most excited about TiddlyWeb and would like > > to start experimenting with it as soon as it becomes a stable and > > viable option (is that the case now?) > > I very much believe that TiddlyWeb is a viable option here; it's been in > use by various people for a while, and the core platform reached v1.0 in > January. > > By default, TiddlyWeb uses a flat-file store, so no database is > required, the data is stored in simple text files. > In terms of complexity, it's essentially just TiddlyWiki firing off HTTP > requests for individual tiddlers. > > There's a sandbox instance you can play > with:http://collab.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/recipes/sandbox/tiddlers.wiki > > -- F.
I will take a closer look at TiddlyWeb as soon as I have the chance. Does it support multi-user online collaboration? If so, how does it do it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
