> "Lost history". There are disadvantages and advantages of importing > the history into git. History is mainly of interest to core developers > of TiddlyWiki, and they will be slightly inconvenienced by having to > look in subversion for history. But a clean break means a smaller and > more easily usable repository for those not interested in the history. > So a question - how often do you look at the history? Clean break please. I hardly ever look at the history. If we keep svn up as read only, we still allow access to history if it is important. I don't really see the gain in moving it into git.
> "Tickets". I agree that this is a difficult issue, and I don't think > there is an entirely satisfactory solution. Personally again, I would prefer that any important issues are manually moved over... even if that is just referencing a ticket on trac. I think this would be valuable to the TiddlyWiki project as a way of determining which issues are really really important and actionable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
