On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:25:55 -0400 "Bob Camp" <li...@rtty.us> wrote:
> I suspect that it's not an unusual stance. If it is common, it would be > something to think long and hard about in a mission critical timing setup. I don't know about the US, but in Europe such a stance would cost an ISP most of its customers, hence they cannot allow to say "oh, it's not web, we dont guarranty anything if you are not using the web". It would be literally their death sentence. Usually, the ISPs here are more or less responsive on any issue a customer has. The smaller ones better than the bigger ones. Most probably because they know if the customer doesnt get what he wants, he'll switch to an other. Attila Kinali -- Why does it take years to find the answers to the questions one should have asked long ago? _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.