Hi Bob!
From: "Bob kb8tq" <kb...@n1k.org>
I think it will be more than enough for my needs, at least now.
From the 2.5 ns single shot resolution, I deduce a 400 MHz count clock.
Yes. It is approx. 400MHz.
I think I would spend more time working out what happens at “about 400
MHz” X N or
“about 400 MHz / M” …….
If such conditions detected, I avoid problem by changing the counter clock.
But it does not solve the effects at "about OCXO" * N or "about OCXO" / M.
It is related to HW and I can probably control it only partially. I will try
to improve clock and reference isolation in the "normal" HW and of cause I
will thoroughly test such frequencies when that HW will be ready.
All the best!
Oleg
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
