> the cost of a big company supporting one more database is not so important, 
> it's much more a political decision.


Actually, the hidden costs of having too many technologies in the stack have 
been realized by many companies and the local political decisions regarding the 
purchase of technologies is now being managed on an enterprise scale in most 
companies just to prevent technology creep.  This trend has been occurring over 
the past ten years and it is now nearly universal.  So from experience I can 
tell you, introducing a second , different database into these environments 
will be quite difficult.

As far as marketing that is another topic certainly worth discussing and please 
open another thread if you wish to further explore that topic.  I will only say 
that there is nothing wrong with the name TinyERP.  It is a rather nice 
understatement actually.

Regards,
Gerry





_______________________________________________
Tinyerp-users mailing list
http://tiny.be/mailman/listinfo/tinyerp-users

Reply via email to