> > I think you have missed the whole point of the topic. This is not the > question whether to service for free or not. This is the question why Tiny > creates fake problems and cripples market. >
This is nothing but an excessive accusation. > > I have googled the net for any type of certification of OSS software. Tiny is > the only, who requires that. > will that do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_Grade_Linux .. or RedHat, themselves. I think your google search must be behind some Mikrotik router or something.. > > If extra modules needs to be so certified in order to be sure of reasonable > quality, then why not certify server? There are bunch of problems in > architecture, slowness of code, security, etc. Lot of the problems are > several years old. Yes several years (!!!), the same problems you are dealing > now on Developers topics. > > >... > > >... > > Maybe somebody has to certify the certification authority? > > So what for is the certification? > Have you ever done software for professional use? -------------------- m2f -------------------- -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=41105#41105 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ Tinyerp-users mailing list http://tiny.be/mailman2/listinfo/tinyerp-users
