Re synchronicity: TIPSters will have noticed that, out of the several hundreds of possibilities, the first three respondees on this topic were all of the same name.
I expect Jung would have had an explanation of why this should be the case when the topic just happens to be "synchronicity". Or rather, I suspect he might have said that this was most likely a "meaningful" event. Dredging up my recollection of basic probability theory, on the assumption there are 50 active TIPSters of whom 5 are called Michael, I make the probability of this occurring 0.001. Incidentally, when Jung decided a coincidence of events was an example of synchronicity, is there any way to refute his contention? Or is it just a matter of personal preference: I rather like that explanation, so I'll believe it to be so. Allen Esterson Former lecturer, Science Department Southwark College, London http://www.esterson.org --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
