Eric: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net >> <mailto:m...@lowentropy.net>> wrote: >> I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU. The >> extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth. >> >> Yes, although 8773 actually is not super-clear about post-handshake, so >> that's actually something we should clarify there. > > RFC 8773 is not intended for post handshake. So, I never thought about that. > What is the use case you are considering? > > I don't have one. I'm just trying to make sure things are clear. perhaps an > erratum on 8773 to make ultra clear?
I do not find it unclear. What do you have in mind? Russ
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
