Ditto +1 to Rich From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Bas Westerbaan <bas=40cloudflare....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Monday, 11 December 2023 at 18:21 To: Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig=40gmx....@dmarc.ietf.org>, TLS@ietf.org <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] Adoption call for 'TLS 1.2 Feature Freeze' The draft itself is an exercise in clear communication, and mentioning PQC explicitly fits with that. Thus I agree with Rich to keep it.
Best, Bas On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:18 PM Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com<mailto:rs...@akamai.com>> wrote: · that is implied by a "feature freeze". No reason to highlight PQC (even though it is a hype topic right now). Yes, to both of these. But I still think it should be explicitly called out. If the WG thinks otherwise, then fine, the document is that much shorter :) -- This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
