> > > The draft does not express a preference either way. > > Right, but I and at least some others have asked that it should. Some have > used the wording 'guidance' and some have used some other wording. But I > think that's the crux of it. > I think there is support for more explicit guidance. There doesn't seem to be consensus on which guidance to give.
Even if it did, I don't see how the FATT process could help there. > > Just to understand better, did you check [0]? > Yes. Bas
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
