On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 17:17 Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 5:07 PM Rob Sayre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 4:34 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> As I said in the meeting, I think there are reasonable arguments to be >>> made about how the FATT ought to engage with the WG, and ceteris >>> paribus, I think it's better for things to be open. >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree with Ekr here, but could we cut out the Latin? It's a weird thing >> code switch to from American English (which is what we use). It's easy >> enough for many of us to navigate, but it is exclusionary, and I just think >> it sounds ...not that cool. :) >> > > How about instead we cut out the meta-commentary on other people's > CoC-compatible stylistic choices in their emails? >
Well, I was not offended or anything. But this issue is actually in the CoC: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7154#section-2 I picked this one because I agree with the actual point, but I am sick of double-checking my Latin on the TLS list.* thanks, Rob * "you can say so on list" https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ucdImHExlbOf4Q3BCG81gjzi2xE/ >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
