-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:25:18PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote: >On 2004-03-01, Ed Wiseman penned:
>> [...] Should I move my SA threshold lower? >Are you using the spam that slips through to train SA, using the >sa-learn command? I don't know if Ed does, but I do. What *I* have learned from sa-learn is that I can trust it to pick out spam but not ham. Since spammers are forging my domain on their spams, I get automatic responses from various places. Some of them (vacation messages, mailing lists, etc.) score very low. In fact, if I didn't know that I hadn't sent the message they're answering, I'd have a hard time distinguishing them from ham myself. It's hard to call them spam (and I wouldn't want to train SA that they are), but they're still unwanted, and I'm glad TMDA stops them. - -- Kyle Hasselbacher "Not responsible for advice not taken." [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Larry Niven, "Niven's Laws" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAQ9jS10sofiqUxIQRAkPrAJ9C8F/Cz9O5k+mzwVBJSBCXLbGgygCfbjnk DkJozU2cA7QmyNqN+jL+xiY= =Iy3w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
