On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Micah Cowan <mi...@cowan.name> wrote: > (03/04/2011 10:37 AM), Kevin Goodsell wrote: >> >> Huh, I thought the limitation was 200-and-something columns. Actually, >> in gnome-terminal I get 223 as the last responsive column, which would >> map to the byte value 255 (223 + 32, where 32 is the standard value >> added onto mouse command parameters). > > Ah. Well, I seem to remember Nicholas saying that the limit was 90 for > the older protocol. That's right about where I'm hitting the limit. > Perhaps the problem is that for some reason my terminal is using an > older protocol than it had been before. No idea what would have changed > that, though.
It looks like 94 would be the limit for applications that are expecting the old mouse tracking with a terminal that is reporting extended mouse tracking. The two modes are compatible up to that point. > > Sure it does. VTE supports any of the mouse protocols that xterm does. > Anyway, just tried xterm (new tmux server/socket), got the same problem. > OK. As far as I can tell, gnome-terminal doesn't seem to respond to the extended mouse mode control sequences (\E[?1005h and \E[?1005l), or at least I can't see any change in its behavior. However, it is sending some strange stuff beyond column 94 when I put it in 1000 or 1002 mode, presumably using the extended protocol. -Kevin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
