(03/04/2011 11:19 AM), Kevin Goodsell wrote:
> It looks like 94 would be the limit for applications that are expecting
> the old mouse tracking with a terminal that is reporting extended mouse
> tracking. The two modes are compatible up to that point.

Yeah, that's what I got from a little further reading too.

>> Sure it does. VTE supports any of the mouse protocols that xterm does.
>> Anyway, just tried xterm (new tmux server/socket), got the same problem.
>>
> 
> OK. As far as I can tell, gnome-terminal doesn't seem to respond to the
> extended mouse mode control sequences (\E[?1005h and \E[?1005l), or at
> least I can't see any change in its behavior. However, it is sending
> some strange stuff beyond column 94 when I put it in 1000 or 1002 mode,
> presumably using the extended protocol.

Hm. Well, I'm getting no better behavior even if I set -g mouse-utf8
off, or even setw -g utf8 off.

-- 
Micah J. Cowan
http://micah.cowan.name/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
_______________________________________________
tmux-users mailing list
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users

Reply via email to