On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 03:46:56PM -0500, J Raynor wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Nicholas Marriott
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Do we need a new command? Why not just a window option log-file and if it is
> > set all panes in that window are logged? People who want everything logged
> > can set it globally. If we have a new command it is hardly different from
> > pipe-pane.
>
> Wouldn't a window option mean that you couldn't stop the logging for a
> pane once it had started? Or start logging in a pane that already
> exists?
No, it means a window is logged entirely or not. Just like with
syncronized-panes, for example. We don't have per-pane settings.
> When I first tried adding the ability for pipe-pane to write directly
> to a file, the implementation wasn't lightweight. Is this
What wasn't light-weight about it? The data is already available, so
shunting it to a file shouldn't be difficult.
-- Thomas Adam
--
"Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am
not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
tmux-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
