Ok well if it is lightweight it might be nice to have, thanks.

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:06:39PM -0500, J Raynor wrote:
> > Entirely separate process that could fork a "tmux -C attach", it
> > wouldn't even need to be C.
> 
> Ah, now I understand what you meant.  That's quite different from what
> I had in mind.
> 
> The desire to log sessions can't be that strange.  Different terminal
> emulators, like putty, iTerm, and KDE's konsole, have the ability to
> log all session output, so I can't be the only one who uses this.  The
> problem with having the terminal emulator do the logging is that if
> you're using tmux inside them and you switch between tmux-windows,
> they don't know that.  They just log whatever gets written to the
> screen, so you end up with different tmux window/pane output getting
> mixed together in the same log file.  That's why I thought it'd be
> useful to have tmux do the logging, and I was planning on adding the
> functionality to tmux itself, instead of an external program, to
> provide more flexiblity;  not everyone wants to log everything, for
> example.
> 
> 
> I'll still attempt an implementation.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
tmux-users mailing list
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users

Reply via email to