On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Reilly, John wrote: > Also, I don't think its a good > thing for the developer to have to indicate that a session is dirty. > I agree with the feeling, but what alternatives do we have? Consider that I might have an Employee bean with a "name" property, and I add it to my session: Employee bean = ... session.setAttribute("employee", bean); and, later on, I call: bean.setName("New Name"); through a reference to "bean" that I had kept from some previous processing. How is the container supposed to know that this attribute is now dirty, unless the developer tells it so? > jr > > > > > Craig > > > > > Craig
- Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interface Vishy Kasar
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Jim Seach
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session in... Kief Morris
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field to Sessio... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field to Se... Kief Morris
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' fi... Kief Morris
- Re: Addition of 'dirty... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Sessio... Tomas Rokicki
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Reilly, John
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session in... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Reilly, John
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session in... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Reilly, John
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Bip Thelin
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session in... Osama bin Login
- RE: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Reilly, John
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session interf... Carlos Gaston Alvarez
- Re: Addition of 'dirty' field to Session in... Osama bin Login