"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>
>> That's not the best example of code beauty...
>
> May be not. But a Kernel needs more complexity than a TC connector.
Correct...
>>> The idea behind the complexity is that we could decide version of protocol
>>> based on the version containted in version.h file.
>>
>>
>> Get real, we have ONE protocol.
>
> And it is possible to add a #define PROTOCOL_NUMBER n where n increases when
> we
> change the protocol. (More easy than testing a version).
Take a look at pr_warp_defs.h when that gets generated...
>>>> Punky, your ORIGINAL file from December last year looked _MUCH_ better....
>>>>
>>>> I'm still -1 on the version currently in CVS. This is how I would like to
>>>> see things at the end, exactly like Apache 1.3 and 2.0 are doing...
>>>
>>> In this case we should both mod_webapp and mod_jk/mod_jk2 version.
>>
>> I'm not -1ing anything on JK... That code might NEED that complicateness,
>> and frankly I could care less.. I'm absolutely -1 on that where it concerns
>> me, namedly, mod_webapp...
>
> Ok... Please commit your changes. We could add the complexity when needed.
We don't need complexity...
Pier
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
