Hi,

>IMHO, 1.5 would be the right way to go. For me mostly for performance,
>and cleaner code reasons (generics, auto-boxing, enums, etc.).

Please do NOT automatically equate JDK 1.5 with cleaner code.
Cleanliness is obviously subjective.  If you think auto-boxing is a good
performance thing, you might want to benchmark a test program.

>However, from what i remember from reading about NIO, it can enable
much
>fewer threads to handle the same amount of requests. I was left with
the
>impression that it could improve performance, although i also remember
>that members of this list wasn't convinced from the beginning. I'd
>appreciate any feedback on why NIO is not a good idea.

Search this list's archives for a detailed discussion.

Yoav



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to