Costin Manolache wrote: > > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > If I make a design flaw, and the entire project gets > unusable, it will > > make it just something like mod_java, mod_warp, mod_jk and > mod_jk2 are... Dead. > > Nobody will get hanged for that. > > > I don't think the goal is to accumulate more mod_warp, > mod_jk, mod_jk2 - but to learn from the past errors and do > something better. >
OK then, do you have some other proposition, or just saying what we all said discussing this subject. AFICR you said that you will have something to share, and I'd love to see some other, perhaps better ideas. > > Well, both Apache2 and Tomcat ( even tomcat3 ) had some design and > requirements ( == goals ). > > And at least in apache2 I remember they did spent the time to discuss > this and figure out the best design ( and quite a few "creative" > solutions were not accepted ). Take a look at apache filters, or APR. > We are discussing too, right? And if you follow the discussion, you will find enough 'design leads'. There is nothing in the source tree jet, and the thread is named 'initial'. After all, I wrote that initial code in a single afternoon, so it's not such a big deal. MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
