May I suggest you to try mod_jk with ajp13 port for Tomcat 4.0 ?
All stuff on jakarta-tomcat-connectors :)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]____
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Dzmura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 7:46 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Help w/ Tomcat 4.0b6 and Apache
>
>
>Folks:
>
>I have received but a single response to my multiple posts
>regarding Tomcat 4 Beta 6 and Apache, but, alas, it, was not helpful.
>Given the otherwise high level of activity on this list, I
>must again ask
>this question:
>
>"Is anybody on this list successfully using Tomcat 4 with Apache??"
>
>If so, I would desperately like to know your configuration and
>see the relevant
>parts of your server.xml, apache configs, and know what
>module/version you
>are using as bridge between Apache and Tomcat.
>
>Our desired benchmark is simply to achieve the same behaviors
>from the example
>JSP's through port 80 (via Apache) as we do through port 8080.
>
>It has taken enormous effort just to get something limping
>along, but still
>the transport between Apache and Tomcat (mod_webapp) is
>clearly broken -
>key header variables have default values instead of actual values,
>preventing the application from using sessions or accessing the proper
>values of header variables.
>
>As an example, the "snoop" JSP provides reasonable values when executed
>from port 8080 but reports mostly null's and -1's, when
>executed from port 80.
>
>We are using the latest versions of everything - Tomcat
>milestone 4.0b6,
>apr, and mod_webapp CVS snapshot. We have tried using the
>Java Warp code that
>comes with Tomcat, and replacing it with the Java part of the
>mod_webapp build.
>
>I have also rebuilt mod_webapp with --enable-debug and see NO
>DIFFERENCE
>WHATSOEVER in the log contents.
>
>Any ideas at all would be appreciated. If I don't get any
>responses I will
>have to conclude that nobody is actually using Tomcat 4.
>However, I find it
>difficult to justify that conclusion for a distribution in its
>6th Beta!!
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark
>
>--
>Mark Dzmura
>Digital Mission LLC
>
>
>