Thanks a lot for all of your answers. Now I understand wh I had duplicate
entries in another table ;)

I tried to use the function .copy(false) but apparently this one does not
exists (I'm using torque 3.2-rc2) :(

Alain


Greg Monroe wrote:
> 
> I remember there was a discussion a while back on the deep 
> copy stuff.  I recall that the underlying logic for making
> this the default was related to a copied object not being 
> a "true" copy (as defined by the Java specs?) unless the 
> associated complex objects were copied. But my memory's
> prone to parity errors occationally...
> 
> Anyway, if you don't care about a copy being exact to 
> the level of the related objects, you can use:
> 
> newRecord = record.copy(false); 
> 
> This will do a simpler and faster copy.  If you use the
> copy to get related objects, only then will the cache
> be refilled.
> 
> If you're code is slowing down with more data, turning 
> on logging for Torque is a good idea.  The logs will have a
> short version of all queries done and the time it took.  This
> can let you quickly find the expensive queries that you need
> to look at.  Generally, this means that you probably need 
> to add an index or two on the where clause values.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Federico Fissore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 10:48 AM
>> To: Apache Torque Users List
>> Subject: Re: Torque is very slow to do a .copy of an object :( Why?
>> 
>> Hidde Boonstra [Us Media] ha scritto:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > sorry, but I think that's what I mean:-) So if you have object1 and
>> > object2 which references to object1 and you do a copy on object1 it 
>> > will also copy and add all object2 instances that refer to 
>> object1. It 
>> > looks like this is recursive, because objects that refer to object2 
>> > will probably be copied as well...
>> >
>> > Hope this helps to explain your slowdown,
>> >
>> > Hidde.
>> >
>> 
>> You may also want to turn on debugging on package 
>> org.apache.torque and see how many and what queries are you 
>> actually doing by copying your object. You may find that 
>> number surprising.
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> 
> 
> Duke CE Privacy Statement
> Please be advised that this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are
> confidential communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential
> and are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient you may not rely on the
> contents of this email or any attachments, and we ask that you  please not
> read, copy or retransmit this communication, but reply to the sender and
> destroy the email, its contents, and all copies thereof immediately.  Any
> unauthorized dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
> is strictly prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Torque-is-very-slow-to-do-a-.copy-of-an-object-%3A%28-Why--tf3565099.html#a9973353
Sent from the Apache DB - Torque Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to