2009/7/21 Max Bowsher <m...@f2s.com>: > Steve Borho wrote: >> 2009/7/18 Jose Miguel Hernández <jmiguel.h...@gmail.com>: >>> actually , when i said branch i was referring to parallel development >>> lines instead of named branches. But yes, i found Revision Ancestry >>> filter. It does not help to quickly scan the changset though as the >>> descendants also get filtered. >>> >>> Ok, so may be the question was wrong. >>> Is there a good reason for limiting the tree graph column? >>> it sounds like it was fixed on purpose >> >> A fixed limit is a reasonable default, but I would take a patch for >> making the limit configurable (and 0 can be a special value that >> disables the limit). > > This has annoyed me too. > > I understand why it makes sense to default the *initial width* of the > column to something less than enough to display all present lines of > history if there are many. > > I do not understand why it makes sense to forbid the user from dragging > the column as wide as they like. > > Can we limit the default automatic layout, but not limit the user's > deliberate adjustments?
Fix pushed to the crew repository -- Steve Borho ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
