Hi, Laurent Dufrechou wrote: > User who use source install will not be bothered by using uic file or not. > Since each time you generate a new ui file, you should regenerate the .py > file. > And commit _both_ of them.
Or introduce a trick to load ui file dynamically: try: from ui_foo import Ui_Foo except ImportError: from PyQt4 import uic Ui_Foo = uic.loadUiType(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__)), 'foo.ui'))[0] It can ease the development process, since we don't need to type `make ui` or `python setup.py build_ui` everytime you change ui file. > From my experience, using ui file (and thus designer) for simple dialogs > lower the level for people > to participate to the project and also force people to derivate always from > generated dialogs. > (Well in my case it was for an in house tool, but still...). > Looking behind, I gained a lot of time using Qt designer, instead of doing > all by hand. > The thing I loved, was that while using it, your code still stay very very > clean, since qtdesigner only define widget not actions like classical GUI > designer. Yes, there's no magic pushbutton. :P One possible drawback is it makes a bit harder to review changeset. Yuya, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list Tortoisehg-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop