On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Steve Borho <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Peter Ruibal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Of the above, built-in hgshelve/record support in hggtk.commit would be my >> most wanted :) >> >> I'd really like to eventually get the following in crew (in addition to >> the above): >> >> 1) Run native hgtk in native python on windows (inclusion of an hgtk.bat >> in contrib/win32, like Mercurial) >> 2) Able to install from source from setup.py on non-win32 systems (...so >> python can import hggtk on linux) >> 3) Build windows installer from setup.py > > I agree with all that. If we did get a decent shelve implementation, I > think we could unbundle Qct and have people install it separately if they > still wanted to use it. This would roughly halve the size of the THG > installer.
Is the 'halve the size' contributed by Qt? If so, isnt' hgconf still depend on Qt? > #3 would be sweet, but I imagine quite difficult. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
