On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 12:39 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Steve Borho <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Peter Ruibal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Of the above, built-in hgshelve/record support in hggtk.commit would be
> my
> >> most wanted :)
> >>
> >> I'd really like to eventually get the following in crew (in addition to
> >> the above):
> >>
> >> 1) Run native hgtk in native python on windows (inclusion of an hgtk.bat
> >> in contrib/win32, like Mercurial)
> >> 2) Able to install from source from setup.py on non-win32 systems (...so
> >> python can import hggtk on linux)
> >> 3) Build windows installer from setup.py
> >
> > I agree with all that. If we did get a decent shelve implementation, I
> > think we could unbundle Qct and have people install it separately if they
> > still wanted to use it. This would roughly halve the size of the THG
> > installer.
>
> Is the 'halve the size' contributed by Qt? If so, isnt' hgconf still
> depend on Qt?
>
I don't see any reason to keep those dialogs once Qct is removed. Nearly
everything they provide is covered better by thgconfig, except for the
username one, and that has a GTK version we could keep.
--
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________
Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
