On 2009 Feb 11, at 2:18 PM, Steve Borho indited: > We don't have a really good regression test suite for upgrading PyGtk, > so for 0.7 we should probably use the same versions as we did for 0.6. > > After the release, we can immediately upgrade the nightly builds to > the tip of PyGtk and try to get some solid testing done on it so we > know what issues we need to workaround in 0.8. > > I think 0.7 already has enough risk with the new installer method, the > new record/shelve features, rename guessing, and hg-1.2.
Agreed. Changing too many things at once... Let me ask again, will I be able to upgrade from THg 0.6 to 0.7 without having to completely uninstall 0.6, reboot, install 0.7, and reboot again? I hoped/thought that the 0.6 changes would mean that post 0.6 we wouldn't have to do that dance, but realized it was just an assumption I was making. -Doug P.S. Now to figure out where that URL is for the nightly build daemon... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and Deploy Rich Internet Apps outside the browser with Adobe(R)AIR(TM) software. With Adobe AIR, Ajax developers can use existing skills and code to build responsive, highly engaging applications that combine the power of local resources and data with the reach of the web. Download the Adobe AIR SDK and Ajax docs to start building applications today-http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-com _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
