On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Chris Withers <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve Borho wrote: >> >> GTK+ has this glorious policy of not changing their DLL version numbers... >> ever. >> I was just describing this in a reply in a previous email. > > Heh, yet another reason why I've only ever considered Qt and PyQt for GUI > apps, not that I've ever got around to building them... > > Too late for TortoiseHg to change? ;-)
Unfortunately, yes. A rewrite at this point would take at least a year, and we're this ][ close to something resembling a 1.0 release. >> THG works pretty hard to avoid GTK+ library conflcts, we put all of >> our GTK dlls in their own subdirectory outside of the system path, and >> add that gtk/ directory into just our process path. > > Why didn't that work for me? It seems that the zipimporter doesn't respect our PATH. See what I said earlier about py2exe and PyGtk being braindamaged. >> Some other GTK+ app is being a bad citizen.. > > Pidgin? Dunno what others I have installed... It's a guess. It seems that for a time, this was the suggested method for redistributing GTK+. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-app-devel-list/2003-July/msg00285.html That file could have been there for some time. -- Steve Borho ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-discuss
