Hello, I was going to open a ticket suggesting the following incosistency with TracLink terminology * timeline: points to /timeline * log: points to /log ... and so forth
Whereas, * source: points to /browser but would one would probably expect that: * browser: points to /browser I found that browser: was already implemented as a TracLink, which is great! Is there a reason we would not want to add this to the Trac help page [1], noting that browser: is an alias for source:, and suggest deprecating the use of source:? Or perhaps for 0.12 just mention the browser: prefix for a TracLink and not mention the source: prefix for a TracLink? It seems preferable to use the browser: TracLink for the sake of consistent terminology since it points to the TracBrowser, and a request matching /browser. As far as I can tell - repos, source, and browser are aliases for the same TracLink [2]. [1] http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLinks [2] http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/trunk/trac/versioncontrol/web_ui/browser.py?rev=9156&marks=715,717-718#L703 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Inconsistent-terminology-for-TracLinks-pointing-to-the-repository-browser-tp27485031p27485031.html Sent from the Trac Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en.
